Pirate Cat Radio

Op-ed

Bush Signs Broadcast Decency Law

I hope this means Bush is no longer allowed on television…

President Bush signed legislation Thursday that will cost broadcasters dearly when raunchy programming exceeds “the bounds of decency.”

At a signing ceremony for the new law increasing by tenfold the maximum fine for indecency, Bush said that it will force industry figures to “take seriously their duty to keep the public airwaves free of obscene, profane and indecent material.”

Accompanying the president at the ceremony was a crowd of lawmakers who worked to pass the bill in Congress.

For raunchy talk or a racy show of skin, the Federal Communications Commission can now fine a broadcaster up to $325,000 per incident.

Approval of the bill culminates a two-year effort to get tough on sexually explicit material and offensive language on radio and television following Janet Jackson’s 2004 Super Bowl “wardrobe malfunction.”

The FCC recently denied a petition of reconsideration from CBS Corp.-owned stations facing $550,000 in fines over the Jackson incident, in which she briefly revealed a breast during a halftime concert.

The agency recently handed down its biggest fine, $3.3 million, against more than 100 CBS affiliates that aired an episode of the series “Without a Trace” that simulated an orgy scene. That fine is now under review.

The FCC has received increasing complaints about lewd material over the airwaves, and has responded with fines jumping from $440,000 in 2003 to almost $8 million in 2004.

“The problem we have is that the maximum penalty that the FCC can impose under current law is just $32,500 per violation,” Bush said. “And for some broadcasters, this amount is meaningless. It’s relatively painless for them when they violate decency standards.”

The bill does not apply to cable or satellite broadcasts, and does not try to define what is indecent. The FCC says indecent material is that which contains sexual or excretory material that does not rise to the level of obscenity.

The legislation, while facing little resistance in Congress, had detractors warning of problems in defining what is indecent and of the erosion of First Amendment rights.

Under FCC rules and federal law, radio and over-the-air television stations may not air obscene material at any time, and may not air indecent material between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. when children are more likely to be in the audience.

“Unfortunately, in recent years, broadcast programming has too often pushed the bounds of decency,” Bush said. “The language is becoming coarser during the times when it’s more likely children will be watching television. It’s a bad trend, a bad sign.”

Read More »

Your IPod was made in a Sweatshop!

It has come to define a generation. In just five years, Apple’s Latest News about Apple iPod has become one of the most popular and iconic gadgets around. More than two million people in Britain own one, and last year alone 22.5 million were bought worldwide: a phenomenal 61,644 a day.

The distinctive digital audio players, which can store thousands of songs, photos and even full-length films, have turned California-based Apple into one of the world’s most profitable companies, earning founder Steve Jobs a US$3 billion fortune.

Last year Apple achieved a record billion-dollar profit, boosted by the launch of its latest nano model, which is the width of a pencil and weighs just 1.5 oz. A million nanos were sold in just 17 days, including one to Pope Benedict XVI.

Have you ever wondered where your iPod is made, and what’s in it? The Mail on Sunday has traced the incredible journey an iPod makes from conception to completion.
Click Here
The Largest Plant in China

Although it is one of America’s most prestigious brands, nearly all Apple computers and iPods are made abroad, predominantly in China. As you might expect, the workers who assemble them see little of the profit.

The first factory we visited was in Longhua, just 20 miles from Hong Kong.

Run by Taiwanese company Foxconn, it is the original and largest plant to be built in mainland China.

It’s a sprawling place where 200,000 people work and sleep.

Arriving at the gates, the visitor is initially struck by the giant billboards inviting anyone over 16 — the legal working age here — to apply for jobs.

Workers live in dormitories on the site, 100 to a room, arriving with a few possessions and a bucket to wash their clothes. The accommodation may be free, but it comes at a cost: No one outside the plant is allowed to visit the workers.
High Security, Low Wages

Security is high everywhere, but especially in the five-story E3 factory that makes the nanos.

Police — not security guards — are stationed on all gates, studiously checking those entering and leaving the site to thwart rivals intent on industrial espionage.

Zang Lan, 21, from Zhengzhou in central China, has worked on the Apple assembly line for a month. Her 15-hour days earn her Pounds 27 (US$49.81) a month, about half the wage weavers earned in England in 1805, allowing for inflation. This is low, even for China, but Zhengzhou is a particularly poor region, so workers would accept even less.

“The job here is so-so,” Zang Lan says. “We have to work too hard and I am always tired. It’s like being in the army. They make us stand still for hours. If we move, we are punished by being made to stand still for longer. The boys are made to do push-ups.”

Every morning, the workers — in beige jackets to denote their junior status — are taken up to the factory roof for a military-style drill.

“We have to work overtime if we are told to and can only go back to the dormitories when our boss gives us permission,” says Zang Lan. “If they ask for overtime, we must do it. After working 15 hours until 11.30 p.m., we feel so tired.”

Foxconn, one of the world’s biggest IT companies, is currently investing Pounds 31 million ($57.2 million) in plants in Beijing and Suzhou to take advantage of China’s cheap workforce.

A fifth of Foxconn’s million-strong workforce is deployed here, working on other Apple products, including computers. Only a tiny proportion of workers are allowed to make iPods.
Dormitories and Barbed Wire

The site, as large as eight football pitches, is surrounded by barbed wire.

It employs 50,000 workers, and its six gates are manned 24 hours a day, seven days a week, with particular attention paid to gate five, which leads to factory eight — the home of the iPod shuffle.

Here the dormitories are outside the plant, and we spoke to some of the workers at the end of their working day. Although the proximity to Shanghai means they are better paid than their Foxconn counterparts, earning up to Pounds 54 ($100) a month, they have to pay for dormitories and food, which takes up half their salaries.

Working up to 12 hours a day, their only freedom is the half-hour walk to and from work.

One 26-year-old security guard, who would not reveal his name, earns Pounds 80 ($148) a month.

“Factory eight is mostly made up of women, as they are more honest than men,” he tells us. “The iPod shuffle is very easy to steal because it is so small.”

The guard is virtually the only person we interviewed in the communist-run country who understood the implications of China’s cheap labor force. “Payment is lower because the boss wants to reduce our costs,” he says. “Prices need to be competitive to get orders from abroad.”

Which is exactly why Apple makes its products in China.
Cost vs. Sale Price

The nano contains 400 parts that together cost an estimated Pounds 41 ($76). The tiny flash memory card, which stores thousands of songs, is by far the most expensive part at Pounds 25 ($46).

Made in Korea, flash memory, which replays the music without skipping when the user moves, is extremely robust. That was proved when staff on a technology Web site ran over their iPod in a car. The screen broke, but the music played on.

The amplifier comes from Edinburgh, Scotland-based Wolfson Microelectronics, whose audio converter translates the digital information into buzz-free analog sound. This essential component, costing just 85 pence ($1.57), makes an 8,500-mile journey to be assembled in China.

Batteries cost Pounds 2.60 ($4.79) each, and the headphones and the ClickWheel used to select tracks each cost 45 pence (83 cents). Labor costs in the Chinese factories we traced are a further Pounds 4.20 ($7.74) per iPod.

Everything considered, the total cost of manufacturing an iPod nano is around Pounds 41 ($76). In Britain they sell for between Pounds 109 ($201) and Pounds 179 ($331).

Still, putting together an iPod’s hundreds of components is a task of fiendish complexity and mindboggling logistical efficiency.

For an idea of the global nature of business, consider just one component — the nano’s central PortalPlayer microchip.
Core Technology

The chip’s core technology is licensed from British firm ARM, then modified by PortalPlayer’s programmers in California, Washington state and Hyderabad, India. The finished chip will carry about one million lines of code.

PortalPlayer works with microchip design companies eSilicon and LSI Logic, both based in California’s Silicon Valley, who send the finished design to a “foundry” in Taiwan.

These sites can cost up to Pounds 1.5 billion ($2.8 billion) to set up, and represent the most complex aspect of chip construction.

They produce thousands of “wafers” — thin metal discs imprinted with hundreds of thousands of chips. These are sent out to be cut up into individual discs, which go on to Taiwan, where each is tested individually.

The chips are then encased in plastic and readied for assembly by Silicon-Ware in Taiwan and Amkor in Korea.

The finished microchip is sent to a warehouse in Hong Kong, then transported to the plants in mainland China, where the iPods are put together before being shipped worldwide.
Wages Are a ‘Godsend’

Will Sturgeon, managing editor of IT website silicon.com, said such global operations are now commonplace.

“Apple are only one of thousands of companies manufacturing their products in the same places and in the same conditions,” he said. “It’s the nature of big business today to exploit any opportunity that comes their way.”

James Kynge, author of China Shakes The World, argues that despite Westerners’ perceptions about working conditions in factories, the wages are a godsend that are transforming rural China. “The money sent back to farming families from the workers now exceeds the amount made from agriculture,” he says.

“Because China has no independent unions, subcontractors like Foxconn are able to keep wages artificially low. Workers will be lucky if they make 2 percent of the profit from an iPod. Foxconn will make less than 10 percent. Far more money is spent by Apple on marketing the product than making it,” Kynge points out.

China misses out on this lucrative market because its poor global reputation means it has not been able to build its own worldwide brands.

“Even if the Chinese made their own version of the iPod and sold it at a fraction of the price, no one would buy it,” says Kynge. “Consumers respond to the Apple logo — not the people in Chinese factories making the products.'”

Apple had declined to comment as of Saturday night. Mail on Sunday originally published this article on June 11

Read More »

California’s Crisis In Prison Systems A Threat to Public

A few interesting political items are contained in this article which has quite a wide sweep —

1). [Roderick] Hickman quit in February after discovering that Schwarzenegger’s top aides had been meeting with union representatives behind his back.

2). Hickman was replaced by Jeanne Woodford, the former warden of San Quentin. But at the end of April, she also resigned after Schwarzenegger administration officials allowed the union to veto one of her picks for a warden.

3). Also in April, U.S. District Judge Thelton E. Henderson in San Francisco took over the prisons’ medical system, declaring that inmates were receiving inadequate care. Now, the judge is believed to be so exasperated with the slow pace of rehabilitation and with prison overcrowding that he is considering putting the entire system under federal control, said several sources familiar with the judge’s plans.

———————

Longer Sentences and Less Emphasis On Rehabilitation Create Problems

By John Pomfret
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, June 11, 2006; Page A03

NORCO, Calif. — This is what conditions are like at one of California’s best prisons, the California Rehabilitation Center: Built to hold 1,800 inmates, it now bulges with more than 4,700 and is under nearly constant lockdown to prevent fights. Portions of the buildings, which date to the 1920s, are so antiquated that the electricity is shut off during rainstorms so the prisoners aren’t electrocuted. The facility’s once-vaunted drug rehab program has a three-month-long waiting list, and the prison is short 75 guards.

It is even worse throughout the rest of California’s 32 other prisons, which make up the second-largest system in the nation after the federal Bureau of Prisons. Despite a vow from Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) to cut the prison population, it has surged in recent months to more than 173,000, the worst overcrowding in the country, costing taxpayers more than $8 billion a year. More of those inmates return to prison because the state has the nation’s highest recidivism rate.

A senior prison official warned not long ago of “an imminent and substantial threat to the public” and fears of riots have only increased, prison officials and correctional officers said. The situation has left Schwarzenegger, who faces reelection this year, with one of his biggest political problems.

It was not always so. Once, California had the nation’s premier system, studied by other states and nations. It had an admired research staff and worked to educate and rehabilitate its inmates.

But like much of the rest of the nation over the past three decades, it enacted get-tough laws with long sentencing provisions that put people behind bars for longer periods of time. Unlike many other states, however, which in recent years have looked for ways to ease prison population and lower recidivism, California has achieved little reform.

“When it comes to prison systems, California is the 800-pound gorilla,” said Alexander Busansky, a former prosecutor who is executive director of the U.S. Commission on Safety and Abuse, a think tank that works to improve prison conditions. “The problem in California is that hope is lost.”

Critics of the system say it is merely reflective of the deterioration of a variety of government services, including the Golden State’s educational system and its highways, that were once the envy of the nation. But what has been at work in California’s prisons also reflects the effect of the nation’s experimentation with tough sentencing, combined with the internal machinations of state politics.

In the 1950s, ’60s and ’70s, California embraced a philosophy that the state could successfully treat individual offenders through education and psychotherapy. Wardens wrote books, including the groundbreaking 1952 study “Prisoners are People,” and held advanced degrees in social work. The department’s research wing had 80 experts on staff.

“California was leading the rest of the nation,” said John Irwin, a professor of criminal justice at San Francisco State University who is a living example of the rehabilitative philosophy. Before he got his degree from the University of California at Los Angeles in the late 1950s, he spent five years in Soledad Prison for armed robbery.

The hallmark of that philosophy was what was known as “indeterminate sentencing.” Judges would give defendants sentence ranges — a few years to life — and parole boards would determine whether the offender had reformed and could be released.

In 1977, then-Gov. Jerry Brown (D), responding to a worries about rising crime, did away with indeterminate sentencing. Three years later, state lawmakers enacted legislation that said the purpose of incarceration was punishment alone, formally writing rehabilitation and treatment out of the penal code. (Brown is today running for state attorney general on a platform that calls for sentencing procedures that would lower prison population.)

Over the next decade, California’s legislature, dominated by Democrats, passed more than 1,000 laws increasing mandatory prison sentences. The climax came in 1994 with the enactment of the “three strikes” law mandating 25-years-to-life sentences for most offenders with two previous serious convictions. “People have this image of California beach politics and the left coast,” said state Sen. Gloria Romero, a Democrat from Los Angeles. “The truth is California is a law-and-order state.”

Prisons expanded to accommodate the influx. Now, a person driving along Interstate 5 from Mexico to Oregon is never more than an hour from a California prison. Pilots can even navigate by the facilities’ locations.

As the prison population grew and rehabilitation stopped, the Department of Corrections turned into an organization with “no other pretensions but human warehousing,” said Franklin Zimring, a professor of law at the University of California at Berkeley.

Zimring and others say the Department of Corrections effectively ceded its managerial role to the state’s correctional officers union. The California Correctional Peace Officers Association today has 31,000 members and one of the wealthiest political action committees in the state.

From the beginning, the union has been adept at cultivating backers in both parties. Union backing and millions in donations played a key role in the elections of two governors: nearly $1 million to help elect Republican Pete Wilson in 1990, and, eight years later, $2 million to Democrat Gray Davis. Both governors awarded corrections officers large raises.

For the past three years, under a contract negotiated by Davis, California’s correctional officers, already the highest-paid in the nation, have been averaging increases of more than 10 percent a year; more than 2,000 of their members make more than $100,000 a year. Their contract grants them better pension benefits than professors from the state university system.

But more than salaries, the contract gives the union the right to reject policy changes. And, the union, not management, determines who fills more than 70 percent of the positions at a given prison.

In almost every way the union seems to have the state administration outgunned. “We sit down to the negotiating table, and we use our laptops. We all have one program,” said Joe Bauman, a correctional officer in Norco and a union negotiator. “Meanwhile, they’re using a calculator that you get free with a carton of cigarettes.”

When he came into office on the back of an unprecedented recall of Davis in 2003, Schwarzenegger vowed to take on the union and bring California’s prison system into the modern world. On his second day in office, he appointed Ronald Hickman, a barrel-chested former prison guard with a reputation as a reformer, to lead the department. “Corrections,” Schwarzenegger said, “should correct.”

Last year, Hickman reorganized the state’s prison network and returned the word “rehabilitation” to the title of his agency for the first time since 1980. Schwarzenegger and Hickman subsequently announced a new parole program that they said would cut the prison population by an estimated 15,000 and vowed more changes.

But the parole plan bombed because it was poorly planned and badly executed and the prison officers unions fought it all the way, Hickman said in a recent interview. “We really didn’t do a very good job on implementation.”

For his part, Hickman quit in February after discovering that Schwarzenegger’s top aides had been meeting with union representatives behind his back.

Hickman was replaced by Jeanne Woodford, the former warden of San Quentin. But at the end of April, she also resigned after Schwarzenegger administration officials allowed the union to veto one of her picks for a warden.

Also in April, U.S. District Judge Thelton E. Henderson in San Francisco took over the prisons’ medical system, declaring that inmates were receiving inadequate care. Now, the judge is believed to be so exasperated with the slow pace of rehabilitation and with prison overcrowding that he is considering putting the entire system under federal control, said several sources familiar with the judge’s plans.

And on May 11, the state’s parole chief was fired after it was revealed that paroled sex offenders had been placed in hotels near Disneyland.

Facing what could be a tough campaign in November, Schwarzenegger is now courting the union, according to a Republican political consultant with knowledge of the governor’s plans.

The corrections officers union had amassed a war chest of $10 million for attack ads against the governor. But now the union is “agnostic” on Schwarzenegger’s reelection, Chuck Alexander, the union’s executive vice president, said in an interview.

If the union maintains that stance, several Republican consultants said, it would be a significant bonus for the governor.

Meanwhile, here in Norco, a former dairy farming community east of Los Angeles, the inmates continue to pile into the California Rehabilitation Center situated on the grounds of an old resort. Warden Guillermina Hall said the institute remained devoted to rehabilitation.

But union officials point out that the educational program is basically a self-study course with little classroom time. Tougher inmates routinely compel weaker inmates to complete the coursework for them, defeating its purpose. As for the work programs, they often consist of having an inmate sweep or mop a small section of a hall over and over and over, for six hours.

“I don’t care what you want to call that,” said Lance Corcoran, a lobbyist for the union. “That is not rehabilitation.”

Read More »

6-6-6 Means Hide! Hide! Hide!

Anyone seen the beast?
Today’s date supposedly a wicked number, but the Vatican doesn’t seem too worried

There are those worthless souls who ignore the power of 666, who believe today — June 6, 2006 — is nothing more than another ordinary mark on the ordinary calendar. They will go about their lives, blind to the bloodcurdling evil all around.

Soon, the streets will fill with death and decay.

Soon, the anti-Christ will rise to render the Earth a mosh pit of despair — an empty, rotted stink hole of evil mayhem brought about by all things satanic. Doom will reign! Faces will melt! The world will explode! Die! Die! Die!

Or maybe not.

Yes, the date is June 6, 2006. And yes, there is a movie remake, “The Omen,” that premieres today and focuses on the idea that 6/6/06 marks the rise of the anti-Christ. And yes, a couple of people even believe it. (According to a report by Tony Allen-Mills of Britain’s Sunday Times, a pregnant Englishwoman recently urged her doctor to do everything within his power to push up her June 6 due date.)

“But I think I can assure you we’re safe,” says Fred Berardi, a monsignor with Holy Family Church in New Rochelle, N.Y. “Nobody needs to hide under their furniture.”

Indeed, few within the Vatican appear to be losing much sleep.

There have been no public warnings, no cries from Pope Benedict XVI to load up on canned goods.

And yet, a legitimate biblical tie between 666 and bad stuff seems to exist. As reads Revelation 13:16-18: “He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name. This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man’s number. His number is 666.”

By “the beast,” is the Bible referring to a three-headed, red-eyed ogre? Unlikely. Instead, most scholars interpret 666 to be the numerical code for Nero, the fifth Roman Emperor (A.D. 54-68) of the Julio-Claudian dynasty, who ruthlessly persecuted Christians.

“The legend of the anti-Christ is that of an agent of Satan empowered to pave the way for the end of times,” says Phil Stevens, a professor of anthropology at the State University of New York at Buffalo and an expert on religious symbolism. “The myth of the anti-Christ has been passed down through the generations. But to start with, it appeared to be simply a very disliked man.”

For the record, we’ve gone through this before.

The concept of a heinous 666 received a nice jolt in the year 1666, when the Great Fire of London killed thousands and left more than 100,000 people without homes. Unfortunately for panic’s sake, there’s little else to work with.

Read More »

Thank You Stephen Colbert.

“..Ladies and gentlemen, I believe it’s yogurt. But I refuse to believe it’s not butter. Most of all, I believe in this president.”

A president runs criminally amok, dismantling the American democracy.

The press, cowering, forgets its obligation to the citizenry.

A comedian emerges as the Edward R. Murrow of our day.

  • Part 1
  • Part 2
  • Part 3
  • Read More »

    Vote Nihilism 2006… or… What ever I dont care.

    “The main plank of this campaign is secession from the United States. I know people say this or that is no panacea, but I’ve been thinking about this one for a while. Secession is a panacea. It would add billions to the California budget without raising taxes, and it would get those red state bible-thumpers off our ass.”

    The solution to California’s problems

    Secession Now!

      Reasons to secede from the United States:

    • abortions for everyone.
    • instead of spending $500 from the average California taxpayer on virginity classes in Texas, spend it on something fun in California.
    • bring our soldiers back from Iraq so they can defend California from the hegemonic United States military.
    • no Christian Taliban in Washington telling us how bad we are.
    • California universal medical insurance gives our businesses an advantage over businesses in other states.
    • develop an energy policy that involves more than drilling in Alaska.
    • a legalized California marijuana industry provides high quality product to the world.
    • marriage for gays only. Straight couples have the same legal rights if they register, but no kissing in public.
    • eminent domain only to be used to take WalMart buildings for low cost housing and abortion clinics.
    • support for scientists who actually experiment and find out stuff.
    • no tax breaks for children, churches or SUV’s.
    • oil company and church tax revenues will provide free college educations for all Californians.
    • friendly relations with Cuba and Venezuela provide Californians with good cigars, a safe oil supply, and Carribean vacations.
    • California Supreme Court justices Angela Davis and Jon Stewart.
    • new speed limit, 180 miles per hour.
    • A Vote for Shapiro is a Vote for Secession

      Highlights of the Schwarzenegger Administration:

    • power-grab election against Gray Davis
    • vetoing gay marriage
    • defunding California education
    • power-grab election against public workers
    • executing Tooky Williams
    • pretending to be moderate
    • massively increasing California’s debt

    Vote Nihilism 2006
    If Schwarzenegger doesn’t have the guts to tell the federal government where to get off, Elisha Shapiro certainly can.

    image2.jpg

    Why are these men ruling California?

    Elisha Shapiro was theNihilist Party candidate for President in 1988 and also ran for LA County Sheriff in 1994. He is best known for his nihilism-related conceptual art, including the1984 Nihilist Olympics in Los Angeles. He currently directs the Nihilist International Film Festival and hosts Nihilists’ Corner on cable television in Los Angeles, New York City and San Francisco.

    What can you do to help our campaign?

  • get petitions signed
  • arrange a campaign stop in your city
  • show your friends how to write-in Shapiro for Governor
  • Contact the Campaign at:
    National Nihilist Party
    PO Box 36422
    Los Angeles, CA 90036

    www.nihilists.net/gov.html
    nihilist01@aol.com

  • Download your
    own copy of the Vote Nihilist campaign brochure PDF.
    It is formated to be printed on 8 1/2 by 14 inch paper. The file is just over 700 kb.

    How to write-in Shapiro for Governor

    image3.gif
    image5.gif

    Read More »

    Bush wouldn’t do it again… Would he?

    “But he wouldn’t do that.” That sentiment is what made it possible for President Bush to stampede America into the Iraq war and to fend off hard questions about the reasons for that war until after the 2004 election. Many people just didn’t want to believe that an American president would deliberately mislead the nation on matters of war and peace.

    Now people with contacts in the administration and the military warn that Mr. Bush may be planning another war. The most alarming of the warnings come from Seymour Hersh, the veteran investigative journalist who broke the Abu Ghraib scandal. Writing in The New Yorker, Mr. Hersh suggests that administration officials believe that a bombing campaign could lead to desirable regime change in Iran — and that they refuse to rule out the use of tactical nuclear weapons.

    “But he wouldn’t do that,” say people who think they’re being sensible. Given what we now know about the origins of the Iraq war, however, discounting the possibility that Mr. Bush will start another ill-conceived and unnecessary war isn’t sensible. It’s wishful thinking.

    As it happens, rumors of a new war coincide with the emergence of evidence that appears to confirm our worst suspicions about the war we’re already in.

    First, it’s clearer than ever that Mr. Bush, who still claims that war with Iraq was a last resort, was actually spoiling for a fight. The New York Times has confirmed the authenticity of a British government memo reporting on a prewar discussion between Mr. Bush and Tony Blair. In that conversation, Mr. Bush told Mr. Blair that he was determined to invade Iraq even if U.N. inspectors came up empty-handed.

    Second, it’s becoming increasingly clear that Mr. Bush knew that the case he was presenting for war — a case that depended crucially on visions of mushroom clouds — rested on suspect evidence. For example, in the 2003 State of the Union address Mr. Bush cited Iraq’s purchase of aluminum tubes as clear evidence that Saddam was trying to acquire a nuclear arsenal. Yet Murray Waas of the National Journal reports that Mr. Bush had been warned that many intelligence analysts disagreed with that assessment.

    Was the difference between Mr. Bush’s public portrayal of the Iraqi threat and the actual intelligence he saw large enough to validate claims that he deliberately misled the nation into war? Karl Rove apparently thought so. According to Mr. Waas, Mr. Rove “cautioned other White House aides in the summer of 2003 that Bush’s 2004 re-election prospects would be severely damaged” if the contents of an October 2002 “President’s Summary” containing dissents about the significance of the aluminum tubes became public.

    Now there are rumors of plans to attack Iran. Most strategic analysts think that a bombing campaign would be a disastrous mistake. But that doesn’t mean it won’t happen: Mr. Bush ignored similar warnings, including those of his own father, about the risks involved in invading Iraq.

    As Joseph Cirincione of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace recently pointed out, the administration seems to be following exactly the same script on Iran that it used on Iraq: “The vice president of the United States gives a major speech focused on the threat from an oil-rich nation in the Middle East. The U.S. secretary of state tells Congress that the same nation is our most serious global challenge. The secretary of defense calls that nation the leading supporter of global terrorism. The president blames it for attacks on U.S. troops.”

    Why might Mr. Bush want another war? For one thing, Mr. Bush, whose presidency is increasingly defined by the quagmire in Iraq, may believe that he can redeem himself with a new Mission Accomplished moment.

    And it’s not just Mr. Bush’s legacy that’s at risk. Current polls suggest that the Democrats could take one or both houses of Congress this November, acquiring the ability to launch investigations backed by subpoena power. This could blow the lid off multiple Bush administration scandals. Political analysts openly suggest that an attack on Iran offers Mr. Bush a way to head off this danger, that an appropriately timed military strike could change the domestic political dynamics.

    Does this sound far-fetched? It shouldn’t. Given the combination of recklessness and dishonesty Mr. Bush displayed in launching the Iraq war, why should we assume that he wouldn’t do it again?

    Read More »

    Bush Playing Politics With National Security

    A smart and tough message on national security that every Democrat can get behind is important, especially since we can rely on George Bush and his administration to play politics with national security whenever it suits their fancy.

    Consider the latest breaking news that President George Bush himself allegedly authorized Scooter Libby to leak to the press classified national security secrets.

    Bush and Cheney have both claimed that they have the authority to declassify information like this, but you and I both know there’s a big difference between formally declassifying a document for all to see and selectively leaking state secrets to the media in order to undercut an administration’s critics.

    One of those actions is part of the honorable pursuit of open and accountable government. The other is what George Bush did.

    Read More »